Learn/Agentic AI/Agentic Workflows in Practice
Agentic AI

Agentic Workflows in Practice

Theory is useful, but the real test of an agentic design is whether it runs reliably in production.

Agentic Workflows in Practice

Common Patterns

Research Pipeline: Search → read pages → extract key information → synthesize → structured report.

Code Review Bot: Triggered by PR → reads changed files → checks style guide and security patterns → posts structured comments via GitHub API.

Automated QA: Reads feature spec → generates tests → writes test code → executes → reads failures → files bug report.

Data Extraction: Receives batch of documents → extracts structured fields → validates against business rules → writes to database.

Design Principles

Break tasks into checkpoints. Define explicit validation points before proceeding. If step 3 produces invalid output, stop and surface the failure — don't silently continue to step 10.

Human-in-the-loop gates. For consequential or irreversible actions, require human approval. A data extraction agent can run automated; one that initiates wire transfers should pause for sign-off.

Idempotent actions. Design every action so running it twice produces the same result as once. Use upsert rather than insert; write to a temp file then rename.

Log inputs and outputs at every step. Agent failures are hard to debug without a full trace.

Case Study: Legal Contract Processing

  1. 1.Ingest — Receives PDF, extracts text
  2. 2.Classify — Determines contract type (NDA, SaaS, employment)
  3. 3.Extract — Pulls parties, effective date, termination clauses, liability caps
  4. 4.Validate — Checks against expected formats
  5. 5.Checkpoint — Writes to staging; flags low-confidence items for human review
  6. 6.Commit — On approval, writes to production database

Result: Hundreds of documents processed per day, humans reviewing fewer than 5%.

Have a follow-up question about this topic?

Ask AI